fix: making tests reproducible - #554
Conversation
|
Boost dependency footprint vs Header-inclusion weights (graph files pulling each direct dependency in): No header-inclusion-weight changes. Transitive Boost modules: 68 → 68 (0) |
|
Compiler-warning counts vs
|
2c223f8 to
34c4c76
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #554 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 92.45% 88.22% -4.24%
===========================================
Files 392 392
Lines 28214 27412 -802
Branches 8008 7997 -11
===========================================
- Hits 26086 24183 -1903
+ Misses 2024 1881 -143
- Partials 104 1348 +1244
... and 263 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Before submitting
developbranch.Type of change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
What this PR does
Because code coverage reports varied stochastically, I had a look to tests determinism. I ended up seeding all random sources to
42.Motivation
Testing
Checklist
b2in thetest/directory).