Skip to content

Update authz_proxy example to support fine-grained auth on Storage Backends#230

Draft
j616 wants to merge 1 commit into
jamessa-storagePermissionsfrom
jamessa-authProxy
Draft

Update authz_proxy example to support fine-grained auth on Storage Backends#230
j616 wants to merge 1 commit into
jamessa-storagePermissionsfrom
jamessa-authProxy

Conversation

@j616

@j616 j616 commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details

  • Update authz_proxy example to support fine-grained auth on Storage Backends
  • Fix incorrect query param name in filtered_object()

NOTE: This PR will not be merged until it has been tested against an implementation with the spec changes in #229

Issue (if relevant)

GitHub Issue for support in spec: #209
GitHub Issue for support in authz_proxy example: #231
Jira ticket: https://jira.dev.bbc.co.uk/browse/CLOUDFIT-5592

Related PRs

Submitter PR Checks

  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • API version has been incremented if necessary
  • ADR status has been updated, and ADR implementation has been recorded
  • Documentation updated (README, etc.)
  • PR added to Jira Issue (if relevant)
  • Follow-up stories added to Jira

Reviewer PR Checks

  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • Design makes sense, and fits with our current code base
  • Code is easy to follow
  • PR size is sensible
  • Commit history is sensible and tidy

Info on PRs

The checks above are guidelines. They don't all have to be ticked, but they should all have been considered.

…ckends. Fix incorrect query param name in `filtered_object()`
@j616 j616 linked an issue Jul 14, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement ADR0053 changes in authz_proxy

1 participant