-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
perf(python): symlink layer dependencies instead of copying them #932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bnusunny
wants to merge
1
commit into
aws:develop
Choose a base branch
from
bnusunny:perf/link-layer-dependencies
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+112
−10
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[BUG]
os.remove()cannot delete a directory symlink on Windows —DeleteFileWfails withERROR_ACCESS_DENIEDfor a reparse point that is a directory, which surfaces asPermissionError. Sinceis_symlink()is now the first branch, every rebuild of an already-linked dependency directory takes it, so the idempotent second build thattest_is_idempotentcovers on POSIX will fail on Windows for package directories (requests/,certifi/, …) whenever symlink creation succeeded on the first build (developer mode / elevated shell). The exception is not anActionFailedError, so it propagates as a hard workflow failure rather than degrading to a copy.The directory symlink must be removed with
os.rmdir()on Windows (it unlinks the link, it does not recurse):Note this also pre-dates the PR (the old
exists()branch calledos.removeon the same input), but this PR is what makes the path reachable for Python layer builds, and it is the branch being rewritten here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checked this against Windows rather than reasoning about it, and it does not reproduce: all four
TestLinkSourceActiontests pass onwindows-latest, includingtest_is_idempotent, which is exactly the scenario described here.test_is_idempotentlinkssomepkg(a real directory), then runs the action again. The second run takes theis_symlink()branch and callsos.remove()on a directory symlink._assert_linkedthen assertsdestination.is_symlink()is True for that entry, so a silent fallback to copying would fail the test too — the symlink really was created and really was removed.From
windows-latest / 3.10 / unit-functionalon this head (job 108558335756):Same result on the 3.11, 3.12 and 3.13
unit-functionaljobs, so it is not a single-version quirk.The Win32 distinction you cite is real —
DeleteFile's own docs say "To remove an empty directory, use theRemoveDirectoryfunction" — butos.removeis not a thin wrapper overDeleteFileW, and empirically CPython handles the directory reparse point on all four supported versions. Adding asys.platform == "win32"branch would therefore be an untested path guarding a condition that does not occur, so I would rather not carry it.Happy to reconsider with a failing case on a Windows configuration the CI matrix does not cover.
Your other two comments were both real and are fixed — replies on those separately.