Improve image enhancer reliability - #108
Draft
amirgholipour wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
configpackage in the image-enhancer container.image/jpegcontent type.Why this change is proposed
The container build stages shared configuration alongside the foundation package but did not copy that configuration into the image, which can cause imports to fail at startup. Large model-facing images also increase payload size and latency without improving extraction proportionally, and uploaded JPEG results lacked explicit content metadata.
These changes align container contents with the build process, keep model payloads within a practical size, and make enhanced artifacts self-describing in S3.
Benefits
Validation
image/jpeg.main.Authored by Saeed Kasmani (
amirgholipour).