Skip to content

feat: Kling 4 on Higgsfield, picker capability hints, and a new-models check - #16034

Merged
atomantic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/higgsfield-kling4-model-check
Nov 14, 2026
Merged

atomantic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/higgsfield-kling4-model-check

Conversation

@atomantic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Kling 4.0 and Kling 4.0 Flash join the Higgsfield video picker (text, start-frame and reference-image routes). Request shapes follow the input schemas published on Higgsfield's console model pages; Flash's endpoints reject unknown fields, so only schema fields are sent. Reference videos, Kling element ids and the video-edit route are not offered.
  • Capability hints in the pickers: each Higgsfield option and fal suggestion now says whether it takes reference images (and how many), an end frame, and audio references, so an unsupported pick is visible before a render is refused.
  • "Check for new models" button in the Higgsfield settings lists video families Higgsfield publishes that PortOS does not offer yet, with length, resolution and from-price. It reads the public pricing page (no API key, no provider call) and reports an unreadable page instead of "no new models".
  • nearestRatio now ignores non-numeric ratios, so adaptive is only sent when explicitly chosen.

Testing

  • npm run pregate passes (lint, structural guards, focused server and client tests).
  • New tests pin the Kling 4 wire bodies per route, the capability hints, and the catalog parser against a synthetic page shaped like the real one.
  • Not run locally: build, smoke, browser and DB suites (hosted CI). No real Kling 4 render was submitted.

…-model reference/end-frame/audio hints in the Higgsfield and fal pickers, and add a 'Check for new models' button that lists Higgsfield video families the picker does not offer yet
@atomantic
atomantic merged commit 02386ed into main Nov 14, 2026
36 of 38 checks passed
@atomantic
atomantic deleted the feat/higgsfield-kling4-model-check branch November 14, 2026 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant