MINOR: Add paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.#587
Open
HuaHuaY wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
MINOR: Add paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.#587HuaHuaY wants to merge 1 commit into
paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.#587HuaHuaY wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
HuaHuaY
changed the title
paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.
HuaHuaY
changed the title
paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.paths-ignore to the CI trigger condition in test.yml.
wgtmac
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Modifying only the markdown file will not affect the compilation of Thrift, so recompiling is not required.
What changes are included in this PR?
Added
paths-ignoreto the CI trigger condition intest.yml.Do these changes have PoC implementations?
No.