-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
[FLINK-40248][ci] Add nightly snapshot publishing to GHA pipeline #28831
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
dalelane
wants to merge
4
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
dalelane:FLINK-40248
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+209
−4
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4734aa5
feat: add nightly snapshot releases to GHA pipeline
dalelane 37aeda8
fix: make python wheels inclusion in binary releases clearer
dalelane 497655f
fix: avoid AZP and GHA nightly pipelines overwriting each other
dalelane 5053bd5
feat: support for migrating one branch at a time
dalelane File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re: dalelane#1 (comment)
@XComp setting a retention time is a nod towards your comment on the storage requirements here. We could make this even shorter, I largely picked 5 days out of the air.
FWIW gzip'ping doesn't seem to make much difference.
I tried building a sample of modules - which suggests that the total size will be in the 1gb - 1.5gb ballpark. That is bigger than the snapshot binaries (which seem to be in the 600mb ballpark)
If this is too big, we could just tar the primary jars, and drop the sources/javadoc versions? Is that worth doing?