fix: handle null lists with empty children in Spark's shuffle - #25544
Open
neilconway wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
neilconway wants to merge 1 commit into
neilconway wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #25544 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 82.38% 82.39%
=========================================
Files 1138 1138
Lines 433739 434746 +1007
Branches 433739 434746 +1007
=========================================
+ Hits 357338 358203 +865
- Misses 54847 54855 +8
- Partials 21554 21688 +134 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
The Spark-compatible
shuffleimplementation unnecessarily copied the first child element as a placeholder for each null list. This is wrong for typed-NULL lists with no children, and was redundant work anyway: NULL lists can be adequately represented by a repeated offset entry, along with setting the appropriate bit in the validity buffer.What changes are included in this PR?
What is the testing strategy for this PR?
Existing tests pass, new test added.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.