Skip to content

Release DataFusion 56.0.0 (Oct/Nov 2026) #24461

Open

Description

@alamb

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Previous release is #22393 (Jul / Aug 2026) so next major release would be approximately Sep / Oct 2026.

Steps:

Features to mention in the blog (if they make it)

Bugs/issues that should be fixed

Before branch cut

After branch cut (requires backport to branch-56)

Community Wishlist

Before branch cut

After branch cut (requires backport to branch-56)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Release DataFusion `56.0.0` (Sep / Oct 2026)[/-] [+]Release DataFusion `56.0.0` (Oct 2026)[/+] on Aug 18, 2026
  2. xudong963 commented on Aug 26, 2026

    @xudong963
    Member

    I can help with this release!

  3. self-assigned this
    on Aug 26, 2026
  4. Xuanwo commented on Sep 9, 2026

    @Xuanwo
    Member

    Really hope #318 can deliever in v56.0, let's rock!

  5. alamb commented on Sep 9, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    318 -- perhaps the lowest issue number left open that tracks something useful. A long standing request

  6. Xuanwo commented on Sep 14, 2026

    @Xuanwo
    Member

    One more question: what testing needs to be done for releases? Perhaps we could also include lance. I'm willing to take on all the related work.

  7. alamb commented on Sep 15, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    One more question: what testing needs to be done for releases? Perhaps we could also include lance. I'm willing to take on all the related work.

    Thanks @Xuanwo -- I think what we typically do is to use the release ticket to coordinate testing with downstream crates that wish to help as we get close to making a release candidate. So for example, @AdamGS often tests with Vortex as part of that process.

    Here is an example in the 55 release ticket where we were disucssing it

  8. alamb commented on Sep 15, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Since this release will have an update to arrow/parquet to version 60, perhaps this would be a good candidate to try out "LTS" / Long term support: #16622

  9. kumarUjjawal commented on Sep 15, 2026

    @kumarUjjawal
    Contributor

    Since this release will have an update to arrow/parquet to version 60, perhaps this would be a good candidate to try out "LTS" / Long term support: #16622

    Datafusion 56.0 will be in a good stable condition for downstream consumers and should be good starting point for new projects. So LTS makes sense.

  10. alamb commented on Sep 16, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    FYI @hareshkh who was asking about a more stable branch / backports in the call today

  11. changed the title [-]Release DataFusion `56.0.0` (Oct 2026)[/-] [+]Release DataFusion `56.0.0` (Oct/Nov 2026)[/+] on Sep 28, 2026
  12. alamb commented on Sep 28, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    Adjusting date from Oct --> Oct/Nov as we are also working on a 55.2:

  13. adriangb commented on Sep 30, 2026

    @adriangb
    Contributor

    I would like to land a fix for #25883 before next release

  14. jayshrivastava commented on Oct 22, 2026

    @jayshrivastava
    Contributor
  15. 59 remaining items

  16. raghavyadav01 commented on Nov 6, 2026

    @raghavyadav01
    Contributor

    Backport PR for #27130 (the TopK reset_state regression, fixed on main by #27142): #27174. It's a clean cherry-pick; sort tests and sqllogictest pass on branch-56.

  17. alamb commented on Nov 6, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor
  18. shehabgamin commented on Nov 7, 2026

    @shehabgamin
    Contributor

    #25853 is a nice-to-have for Comet. It has 2 approvals.

    +1 for Sail

  19. shehabgamin commented on Nov 7, 2026

    @shehabgamin
    Contributor

    Probably too late, but figured I'd share just in case
    #27207

  20. jayzhan211 commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @jayzhan211
    Contributor

    #27219: ORDER BY ... LIMIT above a WITH ... AS MATERIALIZED CTE can return wrong rows (none, in the repro), because the TopKAggregation rule limits the CTE body. The feature (#25580) is on branch-56, and the repro gives the same wrong rows on a branch-56 build. Mentioning it here so it's visible while 56.0.0 is being prepared.

  21. alamb commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @alamb
    ContributorAuthor

    #25853 is a nice-to-have for Comet. It has 2 approvals.

    +1 for Sail

    Yeah I don't know why it hasn't merged yet.

  22. andygrove commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @andygrove
    Member

    #25853 is a nice-to-have for Comet. It has 2 approvals.

    +1 for Sail

    Yeah I don't know why it hasn't merged yet.

    It is in the merge queue now. I will create backport PR once it has merged.

  23. andygrove commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @andygrove
    Member

    #25853 is a nice-to-have for Comet. It has 2 approvals.

    +1 for Sail

    Yeah I don't know why it hasn't merged yet.

    It is in the merge queue now. I will create backport PR once it has merged.

    back-port PR #27243

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions