Remove powermock from xenserver hypervisor plugin

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR removes powermock from xenserver hypervisor plugin

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 6630

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7806 (6089787) into main (7ee697f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7806   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     13.43%   13.43%           
  Complexity     9394     9394           
=========================================
  Files          2747     2747           
  Lines        258853   258853           
  Branches      40313    40313           
=========================================
  Hits          34785    34785           
+ Misses       219689   219686    -3     
- Partials       4379     4382    +3     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[harikrishna-patnala]

@vishesh92 This PR should increase the coverage right! any idea why it is decreasing?

[vishesh92]

@harikrishna-patnala Even I am not sure. The files it is listing are in a completely different module. In intellij, running xenserver tests on main are not generating coverage for the below files either.

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6638

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 6657

[vishesh92]

@vishesh92 This PR should increase the coverage right! any idea why it is decreasing?

It was an issue with code coverage. I could see similar output for other PRs as well. Rebasing with latest main fixed the issue.

[harikrishna-patnala]

Code LGTM.