Skip to content

docs(wallets): document Sepolia gas cap after Glamsterdam - #1696

Merged
jakehobbs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jake/rundler-glamsterdam-sepolia-docs
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

jakehobbs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jake/rundler-glamsterdam-sepolia-docs

Conversation

@jakehobbs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds a "What is the gas cap on Ethereum Sepolia after Glamsterdam?" entry to the Bundler FAQs. It lists the limits from the prod Rundler config (bundles 16,777,216 gas, estimation 16,000,000, verificationGasLimit 10,000,000) and says larger state gas support is planned before mainnet.
  • Adds a warning on the Bundler overview (shared bundler.mdx, included on three pages) that links to the FAQ entry.

Test plan

  • Not run: pnpm run validate, lint, or a docs build (no node_modules in this worktree)
  • Confirm the "working to support larger state gas before mainnet" wording with the Rundler team
  • Confirm the FAQ anchor link in the warning resolves

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Preview Mode

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Alchemy Docs ✅ Ready 🔗 Visit Preview Oct 9, 2026, 8:47 PM

@jakehobbs
jakehobbs marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2026 20:47
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-09T20:50:35.857084Z 383ce37 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jakehobbs
jakehobbs merged commit 91bd5fd into main Oct 9, 2026
15 checks passed
@jakehobbs
jakehobbs deleted the jake/rundler-glamsterdam-sepolia-docs branch October 9, 2026 20:48

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 383ce37da4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".


### What is the gas cap on Ethereum Sepolia after Glamsterdam?

Ethereum Sepolia activated the Glamsterdam hard fork on October 6, 2026. Glamsterdam introduces [EIP-8037](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8037) state gas, which the bundler doesn't fully support above the [EIP-7825](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7825) transaction gas cap of 16,777,216 gas. To stay under it, the bundler enforces these limits on Ethereum Sepolia:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Distinguish execution gas from total transaction gas

For Glamsterdam transactions that use the new state-gas reservoir, 16,777,216 is only the EIP-7825 execution-gas ceiling, not the total transaction gas cap: EIP-8037 permits tx.gas up to 2^32−1 so additional state gas can exceed that boundary. Calling this a transaction gas cap obscures the exact capability that the bundler currently lacks and can lead readers to mistake an Alchemy limitation for a protocol-wide limit; describe it as the execution-gas cap instead.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants