Skip to content

Spell out the upload-size conversion - #23

Merged
agarzon merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/upload-units-wording
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

agarzon merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/upload-units-wording

Conversation

@agarzon

@agarzon agarzon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Copilot's nit on #22, which arrived 29 seconds after it merged. mb × 1024 × 1024 used an undefined shorthand and a multiplication sign that looked like code without being any, so the conversion is now written out plainly.

One line, docs only, no version bump.

`mb × 1024 × 1024` leaned on an undefined shorthand and a multiplication
sign that read as code without being any. Written out plainly instead.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 3, 2026 20:04

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

It’s a docs-only clarification with no functional impact; only a minor grammar nit was identified.

Pull request overview

This PR clarifies the documentation for write.max_upload_mb by spelling out the MiB-to-bytes conversion using an explicit 1024 * 1024 multiplier, removing ambiguous shorthand.

Changes:

  • Reword write.max_upload_mb docs to explicitly state the value is multiplied by 1024 * 1024.
  • Remove the non-code-looking mb × 1024 × 1024 shorthand from the README table row.
File summaries
File Description
README.md Clarifies the upload-size conversion wording to be explicit and unambiguous.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
@agarzon
agarzon merged commit 19fc0fe into main Sep 3, 2026
1 check passed
@agarzon
agarzon deleted the docs/upload-units-wording branch September 3, 2026 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants