Skip to content

feat(indexing): support checkpoint storage#410

Merged
yordis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
yordis/feat-index-checkpoint-store
Jun 28, 2026
Merged

feat(indexing): support checkpoint storage#410
yordis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
yordis/feat-index-checkpoint-store

Conversation

@yordis

@yordis yordis commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Indexing components need a tested checkpoint boundary before lifecycle wiring can safely resume work.
  • Keeping checkpoint state isolated reduces risk when future processors begin committing progress.

Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
New isolated abstraction and tests only; no changes to production wiring or durable checkpoint paths in this diff.

Overview
Introduces IIndexCheckpointStore with async Read / Write for IndexCheckpoint (commit/prepare positions), plus a thread-safe InMemoryIndexCheckpointStore that honors cancellation and overwrites on write.

Adds xUnit coverage for empty read, round-trip, overwrite, and cancelled read/write. This is foundational storage for indexing progress; the diff does not wire it into node lifecycle or durable persistence yet.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6aa8fd2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@yordis, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 36 minutes and 5 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9fd2cdc3-c339-4c80-8a58-e68e8a90f524

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cd4d2b and 6aa8fd2.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/EventStore.Core.XUnit.Tests/Services/Storage/Indexing/InMemoryIndexCheckpointStoreTests.cs
  • src/EventStore.Core/Services/Storage/Indexing/IIndexCheckpointStore.cs
  • src/EventStore.Core/Services/Storage/Indexing/InMemoryIndexCheckpointStore.cs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch yordis/feat-index-checkpoint-store

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@yordis yordis merged commit 066ad50 into master Jun 28, 2026
21 checks passed
@yordis yordis deleted the yordis/feat-index-checkpoint-store branch June 28, 2026 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant