Skip to content

Land the two changes that merged into a branch instead of master - #59

Merged
FrayxRulez merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
restore-stack
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

FrayxRulez merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
restore-stack

Conversation

@FrayxRulez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#56 and #58 never reached master. My fault: I opened both against unicode-classes rather than master, so when they were merged they went into that branch, which is where they still are. GitHub reports them as merged, and they are — just not here.

This replays the two commits onto current master, without disturbing what has landed since. It carries no grammars.dat: master's was regenerated after #55 and #57, and the bot will regenerate it again for this, because generate.js is in the workflow's path filter.

Merging unicode-classes directly would not have worked: it predates #57 and carries an older grammars.dat, so it would have reverted both.

Once this is in, the .dat the bot produces should drop the last 33 patterns holding a truncated byte, and the check this adds will be running on every pull request that touches a grammar.

Please delete unicode-classes, check-grammars and write-string afterwards, so the merged-but-stranded commits cannot be mistaken for live branches.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@FrayxRulez
FrayxRulez merged commit 2f9ca45 into master Sep 21, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant