chore(straymark): architecture model + retroactive close of CHARTER-12/13/14#37
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…2/13/14 Two governance housekeeping items surfaced while mapping the architecture: - Architecture model (.straymark/architecture/): refined the `generate` seed into 8 real layers (Native FFI → Core → Versioning → Engine Adapters → Server → Persistence → Samples → Tests), reassigned all 9 components out of `unassigned`, and wired 14 dependency links matching docs/architecture.md. Both model.yml (3D links) and plan.drawio (2D edges) updated; `architecture validate` green. - Retroactive close of CHARTER-12/13/14: their code was merged (PRs #28/#29/#30) but `charter close` was never run, so `status --where` correctly flagged three phantom in-progress Charters. Closed all three with minimal, honest telemetry — facts on record only (declared effort, real AILOG ids, no scope change); subjective/unmeasured fields omitted as honest gaps. `status --where` now shows "no in-progress Charter". All 14 Charters are `closed`. Note: the architecture model is EXPERIMENTAL (Loom A1.x), not part of the supported Framework/CLI contract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two StrayMark governance items, surfaced while mapping the architecture with
/straymark-architecture.Architecture model (
.straymark/architecture/)Refined the
generateseed into real intent:unassignedlayer.docs/architecture.md("dependencies point toward the core").model.yml(3D links) andplan.drawio(2D edges) written;straymark architecture validateis green.Retroactive close of CHARTER-12/13/14
Their code was merged (PRs #28/#29/#30) but
charter closewas never run — sostatus --wherecorrectly flagged three phantomin-progressCharters. Closed all three with minimal, honest telemetry: facts on record only (declared effort L/S/L, real AILOG ids,completed_as_planned, no scope change); subjective/unmeasured fields (satisfaction, effort drift, external audit) omitted as honest gaps, not invented. Each.telemetry.yamlnotes it is a retroactive minimal close.Result: all 14 Charters
closed;status --wherenow shows "no in-progress Charter".🤖 Generated with Claude Code