Skip to content

[Performance] Optimize rejectGeneratedStaticAssets - #8433

Draft
gonzaloriestra wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
performance-optimize-reject-generated-assets-1343280872611196807
Draft

[Performance] Optimize rejectGeneratedStaticAssets#8433
gonzaloriestra wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
performance-optimize-reject-generated-assets-1343280872611196807

Conversation

@gonzaloriestra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Optimized rejectGeneratedStaticAssets in packages/theme/src/cli/utilities/asset-checksum.ts by replacing chained .filter().map() with a single for...of loop when building liquidAssetKeys, eliminating intermediate array allocations and extra iterations.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1343280872611196807 started by @gonzaloriestra

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the no-changelog This PR doesn't include a changeset entry. Is an internal only change not relevant to end users. label Aug 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-changelog This PR doesn't include a changeset entry. Is an internal only change not relevant to end users.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant