[bsp] Place SConscript outputs under build directories#11630
Open
CYFS3 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献!Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread! 为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范,请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流(如果格式化CI运行失败)。 🛠 操作步骤 | Steps
完成后,提交将自动更新至 如有问题欢迎联系我们,再次感谢您的贡献!💐 |
CYFS3
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 17, 2026 05:19
CYFS3
requested review from
Rbb666,
kurisaW,
mysterywolf and
supperthomas
as code owners
July 17, 2026 05:19
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)
[
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
部分 BSP 在顶层 SConstruct 中直接加载共享 SConscript,但没有指定 variant_dir,SCons 会将生成的目标文件写入共享源码目录。这会污染源码树,并可能让不同 BSP 或不同内核配置复用不兼容的目标文件。
你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
代码质量 Code Quality:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up