Repository navigation
vine_virus_photo_dataset: provenance, citation, license and crop type - #90
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The entry was imported from S3 in July with no source. The data is the UCCE Napa County / North Coast grower photo catalog behind MacDonald et al. 2025, Plant Disease 109(7), doi:10.1094/PDIS-09-24-2048-RE (virus status verified by RT-PCR/LAMP). Adds location, collection period, equipment, citation and bibtex; crop_types "vine" -> "grape" (canonical); license Apache 2.0 -> cc-by-4.0 to match the Hub card; classes as a list like the other entries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
masonearles
force-pushed
the
fix/vine-virus-photo-dataset-metadata
branch
from
October 21, 2026 12:57
2c5f015 to
a20bf43
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
vine_virus_photo_datasetwas imported from S3 in July with no provenance. It is the UCCE Napa County / North Coast grower photo catalog behind:The paper states the photographs were placed in AgML. Mason received the same 3,866-image archive from the authors' Box folder; it is byte-for-byte what is on the Hub (3,866 rows, same four classes and counts, 11.3 GB), so no re-upload.
Registry entry changes:
location,country,collection_period(2021 to 2023 seasons, early September to mid-October),imaging_equipment(iPhone, iPad) from the paper's methodsdocumentation,citation,bibtexcrop_types:vine→grape(canonical after Canonicalise crop_types and agricultural_task in the dataset registry #87)license:Apache 2.0→cc-by-4.0, matching the rewritten Hub card (permissive, with attribution to the authors)classesas a list, like the other entriesThe Hub dataset card was rewritten at the same time with the description, verification method (RT-PCR / LAMP on cane or petiole samples taken with each photo), the class counts, the EXIF-orientation note and the citation.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code