Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions changelog.d/uc-deductions-review-notes.changed.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
UC deductions documentation: promote the aggregate caveat - reform aggregates (poverty counts, floor-reform costs) run roughly 40% low because the model's UC caseload falls short of administrative counts (policyengine-uk-data#452 tracks the calibration fix; #450 tracks moving deduction imputation to the dataset build); per-household statistics are the validated, quotable layer. Also note the rate distribution is national (regional factors scale incidence only, so regional composition differences are not modeled) and that annual per-household amounts are upper bounds for spell-limited deduction types.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
description: Distribution of latent Universal Credit deduction demand, as a share of all UC claims in each deduction-rate band (rates as a fraction of the standard allowance). Simple average of the observed March to May 2025 distribution (Table 2), the last full months under the 25% cap, rounded to three decimals; the cap parameter reproduces observed post-cap distributions when applied. Bands sum to the share of UC claims with any deduction (0.467). Observed 2025 and applied to all model years as a constancy assumption (published deductions statistics begin March 2025). Treating the at-25% pileup as latent demand of at least 25%, and observations above 25% as above-cap deductions (last resort and child maintenance categories) with a 30% modeled upper edge, are modeling assumptions, not source facts. Validated for 2024 (25% cap regime) and 2025 (15% cap regime) only - earlier years apply this 2025-shaped demand distribution under the higher caps then in force (40% to October 2019, 30% to April 2021), which the published statistics cannot check. Demand is held fixed when the cap changes, so reforms that lower the cap below 15% overstate the number of constrained households and hence the gains from raising it back, while reforms that raise the cap toward 25% sit inside the observed window and are on firmer ground.
description: Distribution of latent Universal Credit deduction demand, as a share of all UC claims in each deduction-rate band (rates as a fraction of the standard allowance). Simple average of the observed March to May 2025 distribution (Table 2), the last full months under the 25% cap, rounded to three decimals; the cap parameter reproduces observed post-cap distributions when applied. Bands sum to the share of UC claims with any deduction (0.467). Observed 2025 and applied to all model years as a constancy assumption (published deductions statistics begin March 2025). Treating the at-25% pileup as latent demand of at least 25%, and observations above 25% as above-cap deductions (last resort and child maintenance categories) with a 30% modeled upper edge, are modeling assumptions, not source facts. Validated for 2024 (25% cap regime) and 2025 (15% cap regime) only - earlier years apply this 2025-shaped demand distribution under the higher caps then in force (40% to October 2019, 30% to April 2021), which the published statistics cannot check. Demand is held fixed when the cap changes, so reforms that lower the cap below 15% overstate the number of constrained households and hence the gains from raising it back, while reforms that raise the cap toward 25% sit inside the observed window and are on firmer ground. The rate distribution is national - regional factors scale incidence only, so regional composition differences (e.g. advance shares) are not modeled.
UNDER_5:
description: Share of UC households with deductions between 0% and 5% of the standard allowance.
values:
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ class uc_deductions(Variable):
"SI 2013/380). Per-household statistics are validated against the "
"DWP deductions statistics; weighted aggregates are not, because "
"they scale with the model's UC caseload, which falls short of the "
"administrative count."
"administrative count. Annualized from the surveyed monthly rate: "
"for deduction types with spells shorter than a year (e.g. advance "
"recovery), annual per-household amounts are upper bounds."
)
entity = BenUnit
definition_period = YEAR
Expand Down