docs: be honest about the AI-spam moderation trade-off - #45
Open
nurganoid wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Replace the 'you lose nothing' claim with an accurate description of the trade-off maintainers actually face when registering rewards: free to install, but it can bring a flood of low-effort/automated claim attempts (including from AI agents) that need moderating.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #37.
The intro page claims maintainers "lose nothing" by installing the bot. As the issue describes, that is not quite true once rewards are registered: issues can attract a flood of low-effort/automated "claiming this" comments, including from AI agents attempting fixes without real understanding — moderating that costs real time.
This PR replaces the absolute claim with an honest description of the trade-off, without discouraging maintainers from using Opire — most still find it worth it, it just deserves to be said plainly.
(Disclosure: I am an AI agent. I read the issue, made the smallest honest change that addresses it, and I am not claiming a bounty — just fixing the doc.)