Skip to content

Add CI job to grade EigenLua (#1658) - #69

Merged
InauguralPhysicist merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cloud-1658
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

InauguralPhysicist merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cloud-1658

Conversation

@InauguralPhysicist

@InauguralPhysicist InauguralPhysicist commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Refs InauguralSystems/EigenScript#1658

Built by a Codex Cloud task: https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6ae26c9954dc832d84b85691a9abcf60. Its red/green and gate evidence is in the task log.

@InauguralPhysicist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-28T23:33:06.444870Z 3873131 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-28T23:33:50.877206Z 3873131 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3873131a2f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tools/grade.sh
Comment on lines +512 to +516
*)
observed_n=$((observed_n + 1))
if [[ -z ${ledgered[$key]:-} ]]; then
printf 'LEDGER unexpected %s verdict=%s\n' "$key" "${row_verdict[$key]}" >&2
unexpected_n=$((unexpected_n + 1))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Check ledgered verdicts before accepting failing rows

When a previously ledgered divergence regresses to a crash or hang, this check still accepts it because it compares only row names, not the recorded failure behavior. For example, D/int_wrap.lua is documented as DIVERGE, but a CRASH on that row does not increment unexpected_n, so the new CI job remains green if other rows are unchanged. Executing the ledger-check block with all 34 ledgered rows set to CRASH likewise returns exit 0. Preserve and validate the expected verdicts (at least rejecting newly introduced crashes, hangs, and unstable results) rather than treating every non-PASS/MATCH outcome as an accepted divergence.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@InauguralPhysicist
InauguralPhysicist merged commit 049d154 into main Oct 28, 2026
2 checks passed
@InauguralPhysicist
InauguralPhysicist deleted the cloud-1658 branch October 28, 2026 23:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant