Repository navigation
build(deps): bump oRPC to 2.0.0-beta.42 and Drizzle to 1.0.0-rc.5-5935859 - #58
Conversation
|
@codex security review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
🛡️ Codex Security ReviewSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
432d4ae to
61afa52
Compare
|
@codex security review |
🛡️ Codex Security ReviewSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex security review |
61afa52 to
9719be7
Compare
|
@codex security review |
🛡️ Codex Security ReviewSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
…5859 @orpc/client, @orpc/server and @orpc/contract move together, as do drizzle-orm and drizzle-kit. The catalog and the published process-graph manifest (dependencies, dev dependencies and exact prerelease peers) carry the same versions. Comments and docs that named the previous prerelease versions no longer do.
Drizzle 1.0.0-rc.5 decodes stored values through a codec set supplied by the driver, and the sqlite-proxy driver has none by default. JSON text columns came back as strings and integer booleans as numbers, so every model load failed schema validation inside the worker. SQLite wasm answers in array mode with native values and Uint8Array blobs, as sql.js does, so the sql.js codecs apply.
9719be7 to
af47918
Compare
|
@codex security review |
🛡️ Codex Security ReviewSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
1 participant
Supersedes #47, #48, #49, #50 and #51, which only work together.
Bumps
@orpc/client,@orpc/serverand@orpc/contractto 2.0.0-beta.42 anddrizzle-ormanddrizzle-kitto 1.0.0-rc.5-5935859, in the catalog and in the publishedprocess-graphmanifest (dependencies, dev dependencies and the exact prerelease peers).Drizzle rc.5 decodes stored values through a codec set the driver supplies, and the
sqlite-proxydriver has none by default, so the SQLite wasm store returned JSON columns as strings and integer booleans as numbers and every model load failed validation in the worker. The wasm worker now passes the sql.js codecs, which match SQLite wasm's array-mode rows. The node driver supplies its own codecs and is unaffected.drizzle-kit generateagainst rc.5 reports no schema changes, so the committed migrations and snapshots are unchanged. oRPC beta.42 has no breaking changes (standard-server and openapi-spec upgrades, a batch abort fix).Closes #54