PANA-5681: Integrate HeatmapIdentifierRegistry into Session Replay for heatmaps [4 of 4]

[gonzalezreal]

What does this PR do?

Wires ViewIdentityResolver into Session Replay to populate permanentId on wireframes. This enables correlating wireframes with RUM action events for heatmap visualization.

Key changes:

• Adds public ViewIdentityProvider interface for Session Replay's view identity resolution
• Adapts internal ViewIdentityResolver (from RUM feature context) via ViewIdentityResolverAdapter
• Adds viewIdentityProvider to MappingContext for use by all wireframe mappers
• Populates permanentId in all wireframe types (Shape, Text, Image, Placeholder, Webview)
• Calls onWindowRefreshed() on each draw pass to index the current view hierarchy

Motivation

Support mobile heatmaps. This is the final piece connecting Session Replay wireframes to RUM actions.

Additional Notes

• Depends on PANA-5681: Integrate HeatmapIdentifierRegistry into RUM for heatmaps [3 of 4] #3205
• Ported from PANA-5681: Heatmaps #3164. Also updates MappingContextForgeryFactory in session-replay-compose and session-replay-material test suites.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
• Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 39a5a2b5af

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.06349% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.16%. Comparing base (ac886da) to head (03802d0).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...lay/internal/recorder/HeatmapIdentifierResolver.kt	90.91%	6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...essionreplay/internal/recorder/SnapshotProducer.kt	92.68%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...internal/recorder/DefaultOnDrawListenerProducer.kt	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...nreplay/internal/recorder/SessionReplayRecorder.kt	85.71%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../sessionreplay/internal/processor/NodeFlattener.kt	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           feature/heatmaps    #3206      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             72.04%   72.16%   +0.12%     
====================================================
  Files                   967      970       +3     
  Lines                 35499    35656     +157     
  Branches               5887     5936      +49     
====================================================
+ Hits                  25575    25730     +155     
+ Misses                 8304     8300       -4     
- Partials               1620     1626       +6     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...dog/android/internal/heatmaps/HeatmapIdentifier.kt	77.78% <100.00%> (ø)
.../sessionreplay/internal/DefaultRecorderProvider.kt	94.37% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
...play/internal/DeferredHeatmapIdentifierRegistry.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...replay/internal/SessionReplayRumContextProvider.kt	92.31% <100.00%> (+0.64%)	⬆️
...onreplay/internal/processor/HeatmapWireframeExt.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ssionreplay/internal/processor/MutationResolver.kt	89.45% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
...og/android/sessionreplay/internal/recorder/Node.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nternal/recorder/listener/WindowsOnDrawListener.kt	93.18% <100.00%> (+0.50%)	⬆️
...onreplay/internal/utils/SessionReplayRumContext.kt	90.91% <100.00%> (+0.91%)	⬆️
.../sessionreplay/internal/processor/NodeFlattener.kt	94.44% <50.00%> (-5.56%)	⬇️
... and 4 more

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 03802d0335

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Recompute cached descendants when ancestor path changes

When a non-clickable ViewGroup with clickable descendants is reordered among same-type siblings, the container's nodePath changes but each child keeps the same direct parent and child component. This cache check only validates the child's last path component, so resolveIdentity() reuses the old viewPath/permanentId for the descendant and publishIfChanged() may skip updating the registry, causing heatmap actions for the moved child to correlate to its previous hierarchy position. Include the current nodePath prefix in the cache validation before reusing the entry.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.