Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove the exact directed-cycle tariff for lee-phys's #6210 independent radical demand
(e,h,e+h+z)overR16=F2[e,h,z]/(e,h,z)^2. Claim type: scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration, produced by Nick Petalas. No new κ.At insertion/reverse prices 100 and cycle price 1, the exact optimum is 206. Every two-insertion cycle word needs at least six ADDs. An eight-gate attaining word, listed chronologically, is
The word preserves the source and restores all three independent dirt columns at every positive data width. Cyclic relabeling gives an attaining word at any minimum-price insertion root. The all-word proof separates the unit/nonunit cases of a possible five-ADD chain; the full price cone also prices additional insertions and reverse edges.
This answers one independently directed-price family of #6210 Open next question 2. Its demand, arbitrary-dirty contract, incoming-row return lemma and two-unit insertion argument remain credited to lee-phys. The new contribution is the six-cycle-ADD lower bound, word and sharp price cone. The first-order subspace method follows Nick Petalas's older #6693; the new checker has standalone bit packing and imports no predecessor executable. Retain #5259/#5163, Ali Romman #5310/#5266, Krzysztof Wojt #5045, Ross Richardson #3063/#3121, Nick Petalas #4916/#5208 and the earlier fanout lineage. The older #5933 and #6663 have different demands. No general priority is claimed for square-zero expansion or dirty echoes.
Evidence
Before, the destination-row relaxation does not determine this directed price. After, a written proof and literal attaining word establish 206 on the displayed instance and
2m+6con the cone.At head
fd2952b2b759ef5a5506920469ab2abccac6ab93, local CPython 3.12.15 on macOS arm64 passes:[1,9,57,283,1186,4201,11842,18061], 95,562 transitions and 2,481 closing transitions. Counts refer to merged skeleton states/transitions, not distinct literal words. No symmetry or heuristic pruning is used; zero-residue coefficients are overapproximated harmlessly for exclusion.Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Other machines may substitute their CPython 3.12 path. Standard library only. Expected markers are
PASS_R16_INDEPENDENT_CYCLE_TARIFF,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.Scientific base remains canonical main
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57, re-fetched before commit. The selected binding baseline passes at κ0.00363005817; the historical priority-revision-8 card is explicitly marked changed to this algebraic interface side result. No selected scientific replay is claimed. Advance CLAIM.Entry overlap reported complete pagination for 477 open PRs and 7,122 Discussion records, supplemented by all-main README and merged/all-state object/formula searches. A later complete 479-open-PR source-reference scan found no #6210 overlap; live claims, the open list and local reservations were refreshed before commit. Sparse local note coverage omitted 9,973 HEAD paths. Unpublished work and arbitrary historical diffs remain coverage limits.
Limitations and unrun obligations
The theorem uses exactly the stated three-row, preserved-source R16 contract and price cone. No arbitrary-price classification, larger-ring theorem, extra-workspace optimum, physical coefficient preparation, routing, precision/tape, stock, supplier admission, selected-frontier change or complete multiplication theorem follows. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. The universal statement rests on the written proof; bounded enumeration corroborates it. No native suite, selected cold replay, Lean or Docker run was required or run. Every registered command ran locally.
Open next questions
Related open work
No same-object open PR was found in the refreshed source-reference scan, targeted R16/cycle searches and live open list. Merged #6210 supplies the receiving-row theorem and question; merged #6693 supplies the receiving-row frontier. Their claims are cited and not replayed. No other contributor's numerical result was recomputed for comparison.
The completion refresh read the titles and bodies of this account's nine other open PRs created since the CLAIM: #7178, #7179, #7180, #7181, #7182, #7184, #7185, #7186 and #7187. They study other objects and quantities; none computes this independent-radical three-row fanout tariff. No extra computations were run to check them.
CI notes
CI did not certify this package. At exact head
fd2952b2b759ef5a5506920469ab2abccac6ab93, run 42992841885 finished withplanfailed andreplayskipped. I read the completed checks once and inspected plan job 130429636564.The only failed step was
Onboarding helper tests. Its summary isRan 760 testsandFAILED (failures=1, skipped=24). The exact failing test istest_research_current_status.CurrentCiNavigationTests.test_current_ci_section_matches_selected_record. Its assertion says that 'make frontier7000-verify' was not found in the current CI verification document.The cause is in unchanged canonical-main files at
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57:certificates/selected-result.jsonnamesmake frontier7000-verify, whiledocs/ci-verification.mdstill describes #6030 andmake frontier6030-verify. The test reads those files and compares their current replay command. This PR adds only its six package files and changes neither input. Source inspection and the job log confirm the mismatch; no extra test or job rerun was needed.I also inspected the plan logs of all eight comparison runs below. Each has the same single failing test, the same missing-command assertion, and the same 760-test / 24-skipped summary:
The package evidence remains local: both registered scientific commands, direct normal and optimized checks, metadata/source pins and committed-byte/source-history preflights pass. No fix, new commit, push, retrigger or CI rerun was made for this repository-level mismatch. The written mathematical proof still requires independent review.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way.
Blast Radius: isolated.
Only six files in
research/r16-independent-cycle-tariff/are added.