Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [성능 최적화] ignore 파일 정규식 매칭 최적화#135

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
Closed

⚡ Bolt: [성능 최적화] ignore 파일 정규식 매칭 최적화#135
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

디렉토리 목록을 순회하며 ignore 파일에 정의된 정규식과 매칭하는 로직을 최적화했습니다.

💡 What:

  • curr_dir.list()?.sorted() 에서 불필요한 배열 복사 및 O(N log N) 정렬 작업 제거
  • 중첩된 .forEach 대신 .any()를 사용하여 매칭되는 즉시 불필요한 후속 정규식 평가를 중단(short-circuit)하도록 개선

🎯 Why:

  • 단순 Set에 요소를 추가하기 위해 전체 파일 목록을 정렬할 필요가 없음.
  • 첫 번째 매칭만으로도 제외 목록에 추가되므로 모든 규칙을 확인할 필요가 없음.

📊 Impact:

  • 파일 수가 많고 ignore 규칙이 많은 디렉토리의 처리 속도를 크게 개선 (O(N log N * M) -> O(N * M) 이하)

🔬 Measurement:

  • ./gradlew test 로 기존 동작 유지 검증 완료
  • ./gradlew jacocoTestCoverageVerification 으로 100% 코드 커버리지 확인 완료

PR created automatically by Jules for task 10343219741217069630 started by @seonghobae

디렉토리 목록을 순회하며 ignore 파일에 정의된 정규식과 매칭하는 로직을 최적화했습니다.

💡 What:
- `curr_dir.list()?.sorted()` 에서 불필요한 배열 복사 및 O(N log N) 정렬 작업 제거
- 중첩된 `.forEach` 대신 `.any()`를 사용하여 매칭되는 즉시 불필요한 후속 정규식 평가를 중단(short-circuit)하도록 개선

🎯 Why:
- 단순 Set에 요소를 추가하기 위해 전체 파일 목록을 정렬할 필요가 없음.
- 첫 번째 매칭만으로도 제외 목록에 추가되므로 모든 규칙을 확인할 필요가 없음.

📊 Impact:
- 파일 수가 많고 ignore 규칙이 많은 디렉토리의 처리 속도를 크게 개선 (O(N log N * M) -> O(N * M) 이하)

🔬 Measurement:
- ./gradlew test 로 기존 동작 유지 검증 완료
- ./gradlew jacocoTestCoverageVerification 으로 100% 코드 커버리지 확인 완료
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 82bd6f9beac2316e35a6486faee80baaee239060
  • Workflow run: 29151406566
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head mergeability evidence and changed-file flow before approval, then found merge conflicts on the affected path.

Findings

1. HIGH Merge Conflict Guidance - Resolve the PR branch against the latest base branch

  • Problem: GitHub reports mergeStateStatus DIRTY for this pull request.
  • Root cause: Branch bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630 cannot be merged cleanly into master; the changed-file flow below shows which review/runtime path is blocked by the conflict.
  • Fix: Merge or rebase the latest master into bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630, resolve conflict markers in the PR branch, rerun the focused checks, and push the same branch.
  • Repair commands:
gh pr checkout 135 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/html4tree
git fetch origin master
git merge --no-ff origin/master  # or: git rebase origin/master
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files>
# merge path: git commit
# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
  • Regression test: Keep OpenCode approval gated on mergeability so model-output failures cannot approve a conflicted PR.

Merge Conflict Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
  Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Loading
  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
  • Reason: mergeStateStatus is DIRTY; mergeable is CONFLICTING.
  • Head SHA: 82bd6f9beac2316e35a6486faee80baaee239060
  • Workflow run: 29151406566
  • Workflow attempt: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
  Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

Merge Conflict Guidance

  • Current merge state: DIRTY
  • Base branch: master
  • Head branch: bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
  • Fix direction: merge or rebase origin/master into bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630, resolve conflict markers in the changed files, rerun the focused checks, then push the same branch.
  • Repair commands:
gh pr checkout 135 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/html4tree
git fetch origin master
git merge --no-ff origin/master  # or: git rebase origin/master
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files>
# merge path: git commit
# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head mergeability evidence and changed-file flow before approval, then found merge conflicts on the affected path.

Findings

1. HIGH Merge Conflict Guidance - Resolve the PR branch against the latest base branch

  • Problem: GitHub reports mergeStateStatus DIRTY for this pull request.
  • Root cause: Branch bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630 cannot be merged cleanly into master; the changed-file flow below shows which review/runtime path is blocked by the conflict.
  • Fix: Merge or rebase the latest master into bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630, resolve conflict markers in the PR branch, rerun the focused checks, and push the same branch.
  • Repair commands:
gh pr checkout 135 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/html4tree
git fetch origin master
git merge --no-ff origin/master  # or: git rebase origin/master
git status --short
# resolve files, then git add <resolved-files>
# merge path: git commit
# rebase path: git rebase --continue
git push origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
# rebase path only: git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD:bolt-performance-optimization-ignore-files-10343219741217069630
  • Regression test: Keep OpenCode approval gated on mergeability so model-output failures cannot approve a conflicted PR.

Merge Conflict Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
  Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Loading
  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
  • Reason: mergeStateStatus is DIRTY; mergeable is CONFLICTING.
  • Head SHA: 82bd6f9beac2316e35a6486faee80baaee239060
  • Workflow run: 29151406566
  • Workflow attempt: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
  Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this stale performance PR as superseded/duplicated.

Evidence checked before closing:

Keeping one successor lane reduces duplicate conflicted CI/review load while preserving the intended optimization.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Jul 12, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing this stale performance PR as superseded/duplicated.

Evidence checked before closing:

Keeping one successor lane reduces duplicate conflicted CI/review load while preserving the intended optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant