Skip to content

Add test for DateTime64 without explicit type param - #77

Open
serprex wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
datetime-without-param
Open

Add test for DateTime64 without explicit type param#77
serprex wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
datetime-without-param

Conversation

@serprex

@serprex serprex commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Includes adding support for BFloat16 & Interval types

fixes #76

@serprex
serprex requested a review from theory August 29, 2026 04:06
Comment thread test/expected/datetimes.out Outdated
Comment thread doc/chdb_hook.md
@serprex
serprex force-pushed the datetime-without-param branch 3 times, most recently from c7aad19 to 252c898 Compare August 30, 2026 04:10
Map BFloat16 to Postgres real and ClickHouse Interval types to Postgres interval

Default DateTime64 and Time64 to millisecond precision
@serprex
serprex force-pushed the datetime-without-param branch from 252c898 to 8e7bad0 Compare August 30, 2026 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using DateTime64 in structure silently fails, emits incorrect values.

2 participants