Skip to content

feat: rebalance video challenge tier mix (40/40/20) - #421

Merged
kenobijon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/video-tier-mix
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

feat: rebalance video challenge tier mix (40/40/20)#421
kenobijon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/video-tier-mix

Conversation

@kenobijon

@kenobijon kenobijon commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change

Video challenge tier sampling rebalanced from 480p 20% / 720p 40% / 1080p 40% to 480p 40% / 720p 40% / 1080p 20%. Image mix unchanged (1K 40 / 2K 40 / 4K 20 — same shape).

Rationale

  • 1080p is the most expensive tier for miners (4-5x the per-clip cost of 480p) while CLIP verification and detector inputs run at modest resolutions — extra 1080p share is the priciest way to grow the dataset. 20% keeps the premium capability probe (and its 3.65-4.0x multipliers) meaningful without dominating spend.
  • 480p is deliberately oversampled: compression-degraded synthetic video is the documented weak spot of deepfake detectors, and it is the cheapest training data to acquire.
  • Expected miner cost per Seedance-full challenge: ~$1.86 -> ~$1.48; expected multiplier 3.43 -> 3.06.

One-table change in resolution_tiers.py; all validators share the hardcoded mix so expected miner cost stays uniform across the network.


Note

Low Risk
Single constant-table tweak for challenge sampling; no auth, security, or pricing logic changes beyond shifted request frequencies.

Overview
Rebalances how often validators request each video resolution tier by updating CHALLENGE_TIER_WEIGHTS in resolution_tiers.py: 480p rises from 20% to 40%, 720p stays 40%, and 1080p drops from 40% to 20%. Image tier weights are unchanged.

Every validator uses this shared table via sample_challenge_tier, so the network-wide challenge mix and expected miner cost per challenge shift toward cheaper 480p and away from costly 1080p without changing classification or reward math.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b01f894. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

1080p was over-requested at 40%: it is the most expensive tier for miners
(4-5x the cost of 480p per clip) while verification and detection operate
at modest input resolutions, so extra 1080p share is the priciest way to
grow the dataset. Shift that weight to 480p — the cheapest data and the
documented weak spot of detectors (compression destroys generator
artifacts). Expected miner cost per Seedance-full challenge drops from
~$1.86 to ~$1.48.
@kenobijon
kenobijon merged commit 2975cd2 into main Jul 24, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant