proposal: AFD + WAF + Private Link GLB#373
Draft
rchincha wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…NS253 Adds docs/first-party/ folder with an index README and proposal 001 outlining how to extend fleet-networking beyond ATM to satisfy SFI-NS253 for first-party AKS workloads via Azure Front Door Standard/Premium with an attached WAF policy and Private Link origins. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 10282cca-4848-413e-a12a-f6cf963a72ec
…osal 002) Adds docs/first-party/002-afd-implementation-plan.md — the executable companion to proposal 001. Covers guiding conventions extracted from the existing ATM implementation, a complete file-by-file scope table (add/modify/generated), Go type sketches with CEL rules, controller skeletons, cmd/hub-net-controller-manager/main.go diff, a 5-phase delivery plan, backward-compatibility notes, risks, and success criteria. Also updates docs/first-party/README.md to index proposal 002. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 10282cca-4848-413e-a12a-f6cf963a72ec
Proposal 002: add new section 8 'East-west (MCS) compatibility' covering guarantees for the ServiceExport/ServiceImport/EndpointSlice* data plane, guardrails on the ExportMode transition, interaction with the existing TrafficManagerBackend controller, and required non-regression test coverage. Renumber subsequent sections. Proposals 001 and 002: call out that AFD is L7-only (HTTP/HTTPS + WebSockets-over-HTTPS) and that L4 first-party workloads are not covered by this proposal — future L4 SFI-NS253 compliance likely via Azure Cross-region Load Balancer. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 10282cca-4848-413e-a12a-f6cf963a72ec
Adds docs/first-party/003-pre-implementation-checklist.md — converts the open design questions from proposal 001 and the unstated assumptions in proposal 002 into a trackable list of gates: - open design decisions (profile scope, WAF requiredness, custom domains phase, umbrella CRD, adding Spec to ServiceExport) - external review / sign-off gates (maintainer, SFI, PM, security) - spikes (AKS PLS status annotation, armcdn SDK compat, cross-sub PLS auto-approval, RBAC minimums, dev-sub, chart cloud-config interaction) - overall readiness verdict with per-phase gating rules Also indexes proposal 003 in the folder README. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 10282cca-4848-413e-a12a-f6cf963a72ec
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Requirements:
make reviewablefor basic local testHow has this code been tested
Special notes for your reviewer