Skip to content

docs(roadmap): acter la fermeture de #74 et la priorite #79 - #80

Merged
Akmot9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/roadmap-post-74
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

docs(roadmap): acter la fermeture de #74 et la priorite #79#80
Akmot9 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/roadmap-post-74

Conversation

@Akmot9

@Akmot9 Akmot9 commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Rattrapage d'ordre de merge : #77 (sync) est passee avant #78 (correctif), si
bien que la roadmap sur main designe encore #74 comme priorite et comme
bloquant de #56 et #70 — alors qu'il a ete clos cinq minutes plus tard.

Docs uniquement, aucun code touche.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

La PR de sync (#77) a ete mergee avant celle du correctif (#78), si bien que
la roadmap designait encore #74 comme priorite et comme bloquant de #56 et
#70, alors qu'il etait clos dans la foulee.

#74 est clos : scan_pcaps resout le LINKTYPE par paquet, et trois captures
sortent de l'invisibilite (The-Ultimate-PCAP.pcapng 0 -> 51328,
capwap-only.pcapng et capwap-association-valid.pcapng 0 -> 2).

Le corpus n'est rendu qu'aux quatre cinquiemes : les 10667 trames en LINKTYPE
274 restent indecodees, soit 21 % de The-Ultimate-PCAP.pcapng. #79 devient
donc le prealable restant a #56 — ces trames portent 2403 ICMPv6, 818 VRRP,
777 GLBP, 678 IS-IS et 599 NTP, dont plusieurs sans autre source de trames
reelles dans le depot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e0ace1fda3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread ROADMAP.md
| #46 | Durcissements de validation (http, quic, dhcp, srvloc) | ouvert — #47 clos, #48 clos ; restent #49 et #50 |
| #51 | Completer les parseurs (dispatch GIOP, body SLPv2, Retry QUIC) | ouvert |
| #56 | Golden tests manquants (ethernet_ip, giop, quic) | ouvert — bloque par #74 |
| #56 | Golden tests manquants (ethernet_ip, giop, quic) | ouvert — debloque, corpus partiellement rendu |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep #56 marked as blocked by #79

Marking #56 as debloque contradicts the new explanation immediately below, which makes #79 a prerequisite to #56 while 10,667 relevant frames remain unavailable. Anyone using the epic table as the roadmap summary could therefore start #56 prematurely; this row should identify #79 as the remaining blocker rather than report the epic as unblocked.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread ROADMAP.md
Comment on lines +133 to 135
1. **#79** — decodeur 802.3br, ce qui reste du deblocage de corpus (voir §1).
Additif, et l'architecture de `sprint_02` prevoit ce point d'extension.
2. **UMAS** — differenciateur ICS, s'appuie sur Modbus.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Make the recommended order put #56 second

Section 1 now declares the priority to be “#79, puis #56”, but this ordered list sends readers from #79 directly to UMAS and leaves #56 only in the later parallel-work note. Thus the two prioritization sections give different answers about what follows #79; either place #56 second here or explicitly define separate feature and debt tracks in both sections.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@Akmot9
Akmot9 merged commit 1aa3412 into main Aug 15, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant