[jjangg96]

Outcome

Part of G01 issue #1. Keep issue #1 OPEN and Project #2 In progress.

Reconcile the evidence record with PR #163/#164 merges, Public CI run 41720512574, the current Scale Set release pin, and the independently reviewed caller-protection blocker.

Evidence

• Failing test before implementation: Not applicable; documentation-only change.
• Focused commands/results: git diff --check passed before commit e3cc4be235402194f2a66e994e4c3bf290e3fd25.
• PR quick checks: Go checks passed on exact head e3cc4be235402194f2a66e994e4c3bf290e3fd25; run 41729735649.
• Full Public CI main run after merge: Not applicable to a documentation-only merge. Existing run 41720512574 passed on base main 853d176766db50c55bbf84575c429ed4924db835.
• Relevant fault/security/resource cases: No runtime behavior changed. The github.ref_protected guard remains in place.
• Independent review and model: GitHub Codex reviewed exact head e3cc4be235402194f2a66e994e4c3bf290e3fd25; review completed with no findings. The existing gpt-5.6-luna/max caller-protection review rejected removing the guard; review record.
• Tests not run: No code or executable behavior changed.

Incremental review ledger

• Candidate source SHA and files/risk surface: e3cc4be235402194f2a66e994e4c3bf290e3fd25; docs/evidence/g01-live-canary.md; evidence wording only.
• Findings batched before the candidate push: None; this is a reconciliation of already verified merged and read-only review facts.
• Previously resolved findings carried forward: Caller-protection alternative remains rejected; guard retained, as documented above.
• Final delta sign-off against exact candidate SHA: Approved; Codex found no findings.
• New full review needed because of changed risk/interface: No code, interface or policy changed.
• Security second pass: Not applicable to this documentation-only delta.

Operational effect

No workflow, repository policy, App installation, runner, credential, Scale Set, Docker, host or canary action. The canary remains unrun and issue #1 remains open pending the listed gates and separate concrete run authorization.

[jjangg96]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-03T22:20:13.910622Z	e3cc4be	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: e3cc4be235

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".