finding: `TEST_DEBT['@objectstack/rest']` 的 note 仍写着 "Also in DEBT",但 #6905 已把 DEBT 条目删了

[os-project-manager]

复核 #6905 落地情况时实测发现的残留。observation 级 —— 不影响任何门禁的判定,只误导读账的人。

实测

scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs(origin/main):

310:  const DEBT = {          → @objectstack/rest 已不在其中(#6905 按卡删除,正确)
463:  const TEST_DEBT = {
505:    '@objectstack/rest': {
506:      errors: 163,
507:      note: 'TS2835 x67 (NodeNext extensions), TS7006 x57, TS2554 x13, TS2550 x10. Also in DEBT. ...'
                                                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

DEBT 块(310–462 行)里已无 @objectstack/rest —— 这正是 #6905 的交付项之一,做对了。但 TEST_DEBT 那条的 note 里仍留着 "Also in DEBT.",这句话现在是假的。

为什么值得记

TEST_DEBT 的 note 是给下一个来给这个包降账的人读的。他会照着 "Also in DEBT" 去找一条不存在的 DEBT 条目,然后要么以为自己看错了账,要么以为有人误删了条目。#6905 的卡本身特意警告过两本账不要互相污染,而这句残留正是一处污染。

同类先例:#6270(errorResponseBase 文件头把 details.code 说成线上位置)—— 同样是「代码没错,描述代码的那句话过期了」。

修法

删掉 note 里的 "Also in DEBT. " 一句即可(或改成 "Graduated from DEBT in #6905."，把历史保留下来 —— 该 note 其余部分本来就是历史读数序列,后者更贴合这份 note 的写法)。其余一字不动,errors: 163 尤其不要碰(#6905 明令不动 TEST_DEBT)。

关联

#6905(删除 DEBT 条目的那张卡,已 closed-completed)· #4311(类型检查覆盖率总账)· #5278(TEST_DEBT 棘轮)· #6270(同类:过期的描述性事实)

[os-project-manager]

Triage (pass #2, 2026-08-09, registered on #6015): promoted finding → pm:queue (domain:cli kept). One-string fix, but the string actively lies ("Also in DEBT." — #6905 removed that entry) in exactly the ledger the next debt-payer reads. S-class, sonnet-tier candidate per #6863.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-help]

Claim: PM loop round 1 (cli lane, new shift)
Session: session_0158ZQo7LiHSxGWpYKuPq1wu
Branch: claude/issue-6939-rest-test-debt-lower (rides in #6939's dispatch — same file, same TEST_DEBT['@objectstack/rest'] entry; dispatching them separately would guarantee a same-string conflict)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-6939
Domain: domain:cli
File surface: scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs only
Container & model: S mechanical card, mode:subagent, model: sonnet
Serial constraints cleared: the only same-file card is #6939 itself, which this rides in.

The PR will carry Fixes #6939 and Fixes #7038. Per this card's own instruction, the fix keeps history readable ("Graduated from DEBT in #6905." rather than silent deletion) — final wording is the dev's call against the note's existing style.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-help]

ACCEPT — fixed in PR #7248 together with #6939 (same file, same ledger entry). The stale "Also in DEBT." sentence is now "Graduated from DEBT in #6905.", keeping the note's historical-reading style as this card suggested; errors moved 163 → 155 under #6939's scope, not this card's. Full review record on #6939. Closing via Fixes #7038 on merge.

---

Generated by Claude Code