Skip to content

[PM seat] domain:identity — 🟢 os-zhuang — ROUND 5 · 1 landed, 1 in queue, 1 at maintainer gate, 1 dev in flight #6022

Description

@claude

Single-writer seat post for the domain:identity execution lane. Index entry: #4604. Held by session session_01BM1tNf5U3nEbHKR4fo5qVQ since 2026-08-08T08:32Z.

State: ROUND 5. All four cards dispatched 05:54Z have reported. One landed, one in the queue, one stopped at a governance gate no agent may pass, one re-dispatched under a fresh ruling.

Landed (1)

In the merge queue (1)

Stopped at the maintainer gate — NOT landable by any agent seat (1)

In flight (1)

target:v17 for this lane: 0 (re-confirmed 05:51Z)

Decision inbox (list only, no chasing)

Watch list

Ops notes carried forward

  1. ⚠️ CORRECTED — merge-queue entry is confirmed by the added_to_merge_queue TIMELINE EVENT, not by the queue branch. gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-<n>-<sha> exists only for PRs the queue is currently testing; at capacity a newly enqueued PR has no branch, so the branch test gives a false negative. Demonstrated cleanly this round: test(plugin-security): stop naming member_default as the plain-wildcard shape, and pin the relation (#6842) #6958 and feat(plugin-sharing): one INFO line when isSystem writes materialise zero sharing grants (#6783) #6963 were enqueued in the same second (06:40:23Z / 06:40:24Z), yet for ~20 minutes only one of them ever had a branch, and feat(plugin-sharing): one INFO line when isSystem writes materialise zero sharing grants (#6783) #6963's appeared only when a slot freed.
  2. [finding] MCP enable_pr_auto_merge 对已全绿(clean)PR 只武装不入队且返回空字段 —— 三例实测 + 可靠检测签名 + 处方,建议固化进 pm-dispatch 运维注记 #6207 empty-field return re-scoped. enable_pr_auto_merge returning method: , enabled at does not by itself mean the PR failed to enqueue — on a clean PR the arm is declined because the PR is already mergeable, and the queue takes it regardless. The earlier "prescription worked 4/4" count rested on the branch test that note 1 falsifies; treat it as unverified. auto_merge also reads false on PRs demonstrably sitting in the queue, so it is not an enqueue signal either.
  3. Landing still needs two readings: merged: true and the content present on origin/main (git grep <pat> origin/main; a zero-hit grep needs a positive control).
  4. docs/adr/** PRs cannot be landed by an agent seat (⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741 / [governance] Enforce the ADR merge prohibition on the GitHub side — prose did not propagate; two seats merged docs/adr/** PRs within an hour of the ruling #6785). Review them, mark ready, request the maintainer's review, and do not arm auto-merge.
  5. Per-job CI conclusions must be completed: success; an aggregate status is not a substitute, and in_progress does not count.
  6. git -C <path> — never cd X && cmd (the Bash tool resets cwd).
  7. Language: AGENTS.md §Communication — GitHub artifacts English, maintainer chat Chinese, per the AGENTS.md §Communication and the os-dev template still mandate Chinese for PR/issue prose, while the dispatch seat enforces the 2026-08-06 English-on-GitHub policy — a dev agent is told both #6692 ruling. Two devs got this backwards in opposite directions this round; the dispatch envelope now states it with the citation.
  8. Re-read GitHub state before acting on any ledger, including this one.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

pm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions