Skip to content

Refresh root meta files after the protectjs → stack rename #554

Description

@coderdan

Problem

The root meta files never caught up with three structural changes: the repo rename (cipherstash/protectjscipherstash/stack), the removal of the in-repo docs/ tree in favour of cipherstash.com/docs, and the growth of the package set (cli, wizard, migrate, prisma-next, bench).

Concretely:

  • SECURITY.md had badly stale supported-version tables (e.g. stack 0.4.x vs actual 0.18.0), was missing four published packages, scoped itself to the old repo name and the @cipherstash/protect* npm namespace only, and misdescribed release auth (claimed an NPM_TOKEN; release.yml uses OIDC trusted publishing with no token).
  • AGENTS.md described the pre-rename repo: five packages missing from the layout, a stale examples list, 15+ dead docs/* links, an incomplete subpath-exports list, and out-of-date bundling guidance (predating @cipherstash/stack/wasm-inline).
  • CONTRIBUTE.md was still written for @cipherstash/protect in the protectjs repo (including a JSEQL mention).
  • Root package.json was still named @cipherstash/protectjs with protectjs URLs, and wasn't marked private.
  • .cursorrules documented the pre-rename API (protect(), csTable/csColumn, pnpm 9.x).
  • The org contact email appeared as hello@cipherstash.com in 10 package.json files — correct address is humans@cipherstash.com.

Resolution

Addressed in #552 (root meta files) with the published-package README counterpart in #553. Root README.md is handled separately in #526.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

SDKdocumentationImprovements or additions to documentation

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions