diff --git a/docs/chrome-web-store-listing.md b/docs/chrome-web-store-listing.md index e1d31b6..2f02e5c 100644 --- a/docs/chrome-web-store-listing.md +++ b/docs/chrome-web-store-listing.md @@ -113,3 +113,50 @@ Answers for the Dashboard's Privacy practices tab live in `docs/chrome-web-store | Marquee promo tile | 1400×560 (optional, featured placements) | ⬜ optional | Assets are generated from real UI captures: `node marketing/store-assets/capture.mjs` (needs `pnpm dev` running and a built `app/dist`) then `render-asset.mjs` frames them — see `marketing/store-assets/README.md`. Screenshot 4 shows the Pro paywall, satisfying the "upgrade surface" requirement of issue #14; its caption repeats the Stripe external-billing disclosure. + +--- + +## Tuning pass, 2026-09-24 (proposed, not yet applied in the dashboard) + +Google Task "OPTIA: CWS listing optimization pass + review asks" (due 2026-09-23). The dashboard +could not be edited on 2026-09-24: the developer console asks paul@pmds.info to sign in again +in the automation Chrome. The text above stays the source of truth until the change below is +applied there; then move it up and delete this section. + +**Data available.** Last dashboard read 2026-09-21 (Maecenas +`.claude/research/optia/2026-09-21-one-month-numbers.md`): 30 days, 47 installs from 28 listing +page views and 26 store impressions, 1 uninstall, average 3 weekly users, 55% of installs on +ChromeOS while no weekly user runs ChromeOS. Public listing 2026-09-24: 7 users, 5.0 from one +rating, no written reviews. Installs exceed page views, so the install count is mostly automated +and there is no usable impression-to-install signal yet. This pass is keyword-driven, not +performance-driven. + +**Short description.** Current (121 characters): `Analyze any page's SEO and get an instant +score with AI-powered title, meta description, and alt text recommendations.` + +Proposed (120 characters, limit 132): + +`Free on-page SEO checker. Score any page for your keyword, then get AI title, meta description and alt text suggestions.` + +Why, from the 2026-09-22 Keyword Planner pull (US, 12-month averages, Maecenas +`.claude/research/optia/2026-09-22-keyword-planner-optia.md`): "check my website seo" 1,000/mo, +"seo score checker" 720, "on page seo tool" 720, "free seo audit tool" 720, "website seo +checker free" 590, "on page seo checker" 480, "meta description checker" 480, "alt text +generator" 2,900. The words "checker", "on-page", "free", "score" and "keyword" are what people +type; "analyze" and "instant" are not. "Free" is accurate (25 AI recommendations a month, scoring +unlimited). Pro and Stripe wording are untouched; the external-payments disclosure in the +detailed description stays as is. + +**Screenshot order.** Current: 1 score, 2 checks, 3 setup, 4 Pro paywall, 5 options and BYO key. +Proposed: 1 score, 2 checks, 3 options and BYO key (the privacy and own-key angle is the one +differentiator outside commenters have named), 4 setup, 5 Pro paywall last. A judgment call with +no data behind it; revisit when the dashboard shows real page views. + +**Review asks.** Pinned issue #68 asks satisfied users for an honest Chrome Web Store review, with +no incentive, and points bug reports to issues instead. The Monday LinkedIn Optia post can carry +one plain sentence ("if you use it, an honest review helps") once a week at most. Nothing traded, +nothing scripted, no review requests to people who have not said they use it. + +**To apply (dashboard, after re-verification):** Store listing > Description > Short description; +Store listing > Graphic assets > reorder screenshots; save and submit. No new version is needed +for either change.