Skip to content

Question: contribution path for an optional read-only research MCP example #56

Description

@Michael-aisa-one

Hi maintainers,

I’m Michael from AIsa. We are exploring a small, optional MCP example for source-backed public SDK or dependency research before implementation.

The scope would be deliberately limited:

  • read-only public research only;
  • user-provided AISA_API_KEY only, with no credential access beyond that configuration;
  • sources, limitations, and possible cost notes shown in the output;
  • no change to Klaatu API contracts, default behavior, or coding workflow.

Before building or opening a PR, could you advise whether this fits the preferred path for MCP, hook, skill, or plugin-ecosystem contributions? If it is not a fit, we will keep it as an external community example.

Best,
Michael
AIsa

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions