Skip to content

Missing seqOf. #48

Description

@kentor

seqOf would be useful because it signifies that you should not use size (which would return undefined for seqs and should use count().

Will there be support for this?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions