|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "Representations with the same degree" |
| 3 | +slug: "representations-with-the-same-degree" |
| 4 | +date: 2026-06-04 |
| 5 | +author: "Pieter Belmans" |
| 6 | +--- |
| 7 | +Time for the next installment of the arXiv series. |
| 8 | +Today's preprint is from earlier this year, and it's |
| 9 | +[Frank Lübeck: Representations with the same degree](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18786). |
| 10 | +In fact, whilst preparing this blogpost, I discovered that |
| 11 | +this question was also already addressed by Andy Huchala |
| 12 | +in [his 2018 undergraduate thesis](https://ahuchala.com/files/undergrad/Lie_Algebra_Representation_Thesis.pdf). |
| 13 | +In what follows, I will (mostly) refer to the arXiv preprint. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +As before, we will use [Semisimple.jl](https://homogeneous.tools/Semisimple.jl/dev/) |
| 16 | +to play with the constructions in the paper. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## Infinitely many pairs |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +**Theorem** |
| 21 | +_Let $G$ be a connected reductive simply-connected algebraic group over $\mathbb{C}$ of rank $\geq2$. |
| 22 | +Then $G$ has infinitely many pairs of irreducible rational representations $\rho_1,\rho_2$ |
| 23 | +that are not related by an automorphism of $G$ |
| 24 | +but for which $\dim\rho_1=\dim\rho_2$._ |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The rank-$1$ assumption is necessary: |
| 27 | +in type $\mathrm{A}_1$ the irreducible representations are determined by their dimension. |
| 28 | +Beyond that, Lübeck establishes the theorem by exhibiting one explicit same-degree pair in every simple type, |
| 29 | +and combining this with the following observation: |
| 30 | +the Weyl dimension formula immediately gives |
| 31 | +$$\dim\mathrm{V}(k(\lambda+\rho)-\rho)=\dim\mathrm{V}(\lambda)\cdot k^N$$ |
| 32 | +for any $k\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}$, |
| 33 | +where $N$ is the number of positive roots. |
| 34 | +So one same-degree pair $(\lambda,\mu)$ produces infinitely many at degrees $d, d\cdot 2^N, d\cdot 3^N,\ldots$ |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +This is a **perfect** paper to play around with in Semisimple.jl, |
| 37 | +because the only ingredient we really need is `degree`. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +## Proposition 2: an explicit pair in each exceptional type, and in A₂, B₂ |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +Lübeck's Proposition 2 collects the following same-degree pairs, |
| 42 | +found by brute force over the dominant weights with small coordinates: |
| 43 | +```julia |
| 44 | +using Semisimple |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +# (type, λ, μ, common degree) |
| 47 | +explicit = [ |
| 48 | + (TypeA{2}, [1, 2], [0, 4], 15), |
| 49 | + (TypeB{2}, [1, 2], [0, 4], 35), |
| 50 | + (TypeG2, [3, 0], [0, 2], 77), |
| 51 | + (TypeF4, [1, 0, 0, 1], [2, 0, 0, 0], 1053), |
| 52 | + (TypeE{6}, [2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0], 351), |
| 53 | + (TypeE{7}, [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3], 1903725824), |
| 54 | + (TypeE{8}, [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1], 8634368000), |
| 55 | +] |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +for (DT, λ, μ, d) in explicit |
| 58 | + @assert degree(DT, λ) == degree(DT, μ) == d |
| 59 | +end |
| 60 | +``` |
| 61 | +Note that in type $\mathrm{E}_6$ the non-trivial diagram automorphism |
| 62 | +gives a _second_ same-degree pair at $d=351$, |
| 63 | +namely $\mathrm{V}(2\omega_6)$ and $\mathrm{V}(\omega_5)$; |
| 64 | +the other six pairs have no such automorphic explanation. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +One can reproduce this brute-force search using Semisimple.jl: |
| 67 | +```julia |
| 68 | +# diagram automorphism on coordinates; trivial except for A_2 and E_6. |
| 69 | +outer(::Type{TypeA{2}}, v) = reverse(v) |
| 70 | +outer(::Type{TypeE{6}}, v) = (v[6], v[2], v[5], v[4], v[3], v[1]) |
| 71 | +outer(::Type{<:DynkinType}, v) = v |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +# smallest dimension realised by two dominant weights of DT |
| 74 | +# in different outer-automorphism orbits, searching coordinates in 0:N. |
| 75 | +function smallest_pair(::Type{DT}; N=4) where {DT<:DynkinType} |
| 76 | + l = rank(DT) |
| 77 | + bins = Dict{BigInt,Vector{NTuple{l,Int}}}() |
| 78 | + for v in Iterators.product(ntuple(_ -> 0:N, l)...) |
| 79 | + push!(get!(() -> NTuple{l,Int}[], bins, degree(DT, collect(v))), v) |
| 80 | + end |
| 81 | + pairs = [(d, ws) for (d, ws) in bins |
| 82 | + if length(unique(min(v, outer(DT, v)) for v in ws)) >= 2] |
| 83 | + return argmin(first, pairs) |
| 84 | +end |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +# the cases considered in Proposition 2 |
| 87 | +for DT in (TypeA{2}, TypeB{2}, TypeG2, TypeF4, TypeE{6}, TypeE{7}, TypeE{8}) |
| 88 | + d, ws = smallest_pair(DT) |
| 89 | + println(rpad(string(DT), 12), " d = ", lpad(string(d), 12), " ", join(ws, " ")) |
| 90 | +end |
| 91 | +``` |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## Theorem 3: infinite families in the classical types |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +For the classical types Lübeck exhibits closed-form families. |
| 96 | +In types $\mathrm{A}_l,\mathrm{B}_l,\mathrm{D}_l$ the pair is always of the shape |
| 97 | +$\mathrm{V}\bigl((c-1)\omega_2\bigr)$ vs. $\mathrm{V}\bigl(\omega_1+(c-2)\omega_2\bigr)$, |
| 98 | +where $c$ depends on the type; |
| 99 | +verifying them up to any reasonable rank is straightforward. |
| 100 | +For $\mathrm{A}_l$ it would be as in Theorem 3(a): |
| 101 | +```julia |
| 102 | +for l in 2:15 |
| 103 | + λ = zeros(Int, l); λ[2] = l - 1 |
| 104 | + μ = zeros(Int, l); μ[1] = 1; μ[2] = l - 2 |
| 105 | + expected = |
| 106 | + BigInt(2l - 1) * |
| 107 | + prod(BigInt(k)^2 for k in (l + 1):(2l - 2); init=BigInt(1)) ÷ |
| 108 | + factorial(BigInt(l - 1))^2 |
| 109 | + @assert degree(TypeA{l}, λ) == degree(TypeA{l}, μ) == expected |
| 110 | +end |
| 111 | +``` |
| 112 | +The same pattern works for $\mathrm{B}_l$ and $\mathrm{D}_l$ with the closed forms |
| 113 | +in Theorem 3(b) and 3(c) of the paper. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +Type $\mathrm{C}_l$ takes an unexpectedly arithmetic turn: |
| 117 | +Lübeck shows that, again for $\lambda=a\omega_1+b\omega_2$ and $\mu=(a-2)\omega_1+(b+1)\omega_2$, |
| 118 | +the equality $\dim\mathrm{V}(\lambda)=\dim\mathrm{V}(\mu)$ holds |
| 119 | +if and only if the generalised Pell equation |
| 120 | +$$c^2-(4l-5)\,a^2=(2l-3)^2$$ |
| 121 | +admits a solution with $a\geq 3$, |
| 122 | +in which case $b=\tfrac12(c+1-a-2l)$. |
| 123 | +Because $4l-5\equiv 3\pmod 4$ is never a perfect square, |
| 124 | +this Pell equation has infinitely many solutions for every $l\geq 3$, |
| 125 | +and the construction has the curious feature that the smallest $(a,b)$ one obtains |
| 126 | +can be _enormous_: |
| 127 | +for $l=159$ the corresponding common degree has 15728 decimal digits. |
| 128 | +Computing that degree directly in Semisimple.jl just works, |
| 129 | +since `degree` returns `BigInt`. |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +## Some comments |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +* The seven Proposition 2 pairs, together with the three Theorem 3 families, |
| 134 | + are part of the Semisimple.jl test suite, |
| 135 | + giving a slightly unusual but pretty cool set of unit tests! |
| 136 | +* Huchala claims in his Theorem 7 that there is an upper bound on how many irreducible representations of a given dimension can exist in type $\mathrm{B}_2$ and $\mathrm{G}_2$. For $\mathrm{A}_2$, a fun argument using the rank of an elliptic curve (explicit in Huchala's thesis, whilst attributed to Deligne but not given in Lübeck's preprint) shows that for any positive integer $m$, you can find at least $m$ non-isomorphic irreducible representations of the same degree. |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | + However, the proof of the upper bound in types B and G is not correct: there is a plane curve _for every given degree_, on which Faltings' theorem gives a finite number of points. |
| 139 | + But to prove the claim, one would need that there is a uniform bound on the number of points all those plane curves, simultaneously. |
| 140 | + So there seems to be a fun open number-theoretical question here, |
| 141 | + unless I'm missing something? |
| 142 | +* There are fun OEIS sequences to add here: |
| 143 | + [A000891](https://oeis.org/A000891) are the smallest degrees in type $\mathrm{A}_l$ where duplicate representations exist, |
| 144 | + but the sequences in types B and D are missing (in type C the chaotic behavior makes it hard to produce the sequence). |
| 145 | + The entries for these sequences are computed both by Lübeck and Huchala. |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + If anyone is interested in adding these, here is some Julia code to determine them: |
| 148 | + ```julia |
| 149 | + function dim_B(l::Integer) |
| 150 | + @assert l >= 2 |
| 151 | + l == 2 && return 35 |
| 152 | + l = BigInt(l) |
| 153 | + num = 3 * (4l - 5) * (6l - 5) * (6l - 7) * |
| 154 | + prod(k^2 for k in (2l):(4l - 6); init=BigInt(1)) |
| 155 | + den = factorial(2l - 3)^2 |
| 156 | + q, r = divrem(num, den); @assert iszero(r) |
| 157 | + return q |
| 158 | + end |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + function dim_D(l::Integer) |
| 161 | + @assert l >= 4 |
| 162 | + l = BigInt(l) |
| 163 | + num = 3 * (3l - 4) * (3l - 5) * (4l - 7) * |
| 164 | + prod(k^2 for k in (2l - 1):(4l - 8); init=BigInt(1)) |
| 165 | + den = (l - 2)^2 * factorial(2l - 5)^2 |
| 166 | + q, r = divrem(num, den); @assert iszero(r) |
| 167 | + return q |
| 168 | + end |
| 169 | + ``` |
| 170 | + which gives |
| 171 | + * `35, 3003, 383724, 58790875, 10011037452, 1827174287820, 350280152218800, 69656361253789275, 14250522671900707500, 2982164406170216424300, 635707916954453388942000, 137613009450274251664451148`, resp. |
| 172 | + * `32928, 4671810, 759230472, 134282273216, 25166658696000, 4919891369426550, 993186502108515000, 205625998084534750800, 43449470935521085094400, 9336731949069856461585000, 2034842637042393404135380128, 448826044126481544919237242240`. |
0 commit comments