Skip to content

Calibrate and risk-tier independent artifact review #490

Description

@jeremymanning

Origin

Deferred from the MVP proposed as a fresh realization of #485.

Goal

Evolve the MVP's bounded plan/final-output review into a calibrated, risk-tiered review service.

Scope

  • Per reviewer model/prompt/version precision, recall, false-positive rate, abstention, and cost metrics.
  • Seeded-defect and adjudicated production datasets for calibration.
  • Risk tiers: deterministic checks, sampling/differential review, mandatory independent review, and human adjudication.
  • Model-family versus evidence-channel independence experiments.
  • Dispute handling and accepted-risk policy.
  • Review of intermediate artifacts where measured benefit justifies cost.

Acceptance criteria

  • Reviewers are evaluated against a versioned benchmark and production adjudications.
  • Policy selects review depth from consequence/risk and measured reviewer quality.
  • Review-loop non-convergence and cost stay within declared bounds.
  • A pass reports residual risk; it never claims that an artifact is simply "clean."

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    architectureRelated to toolbox design/architectureenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions